Skip to main content
英语练习考试englishpracticeexam.com
练习测试考试指南价格
登录注册
英语练习考试

English Practice Exam · englishpracticeexam.com

免费练习测试,助您通过英语水平考试。

快速链接

  • 首页
  • 练习测试
  • 价格

法律信息

  • 隐私政策
  • 服务条款
  • 联系我们

其他语言

普通话العربيةবাংলাEnglishFrançaisગુજરાતીहिन्दीBahasa Indonesia日本語한국어Bahasa MelayuनेपालीPortuguês (Brasil)ਪੰਜਾਬੀEspañolภาษาไทยTiếng Việt

© 2025 英语练习考试。保留所有权利。

网站由 S-Block Technologies 制作S-Block Technologies
  1. 首页
  2. /
  3. Cambridge
  4. /
  5. C1 Advanced
  6. /
  7. 部分 8
  8. /
  9. 练习测试
C1Reading and Use of English部分 8

Multiple matching

You are going to read an extract. For questions 1-10, choose from the sections (A-E). The sections may be chosen more than once.

Beyond the Steering Wheel: Rethinking Urban Travel

How cities can reduce car use without harming daily life

The Promise (and the Panic) of Car-Light Streets

When our city announced a ‘car-light’ plan, the reaction was immediate: cyclists celebrated, shop owners predicted ruin, and drivers asked—fairly—how they were meant to get their children to school in the rain. What surprised me wasn’t the disagreement but the certainty on both sides. Supporters talked as if removing cars automatically creates community; critics insisted it automatically destroys convenience. Neither is guaranteed. A street with fewer cars can be quieter, safer and more pleasant, yet it can also become a corridor of delivery vans if planners forget that goods still need to move. And while a ten-minute walk sounds charming on a sunny Saturday, it feels like a punishment when you’re carrying groceries after a late shift. Still, the enthusiasm isn’t baseless: cities that have reduced traffic often report better air quality and fewer accidents. The question is whether the benefits arrive for everyone or only for those who can afford to live near the centre.

Questions
Select section:
ABCDE
1.

Which section/person suggests that both supporters and opponents of reducing car use are overconfident about what will happen?

2.

Which section/person points out that limiting private cars can still leave a street dominated by other vehicles if logistics aren’t planned properly?

3.

In which section does the writer imply that the advantages of traffic reduction may mainly help people in central, wealthier areas?

4.

Which section/person criticises the way people judge public transport more harshly than driving by using different standards?

5.

Which section/person argues that dependable, frequent services and good disruption information matter more than high-tech innovations in getting people to change their habits?

6.

Which section/person mentions that without late-night public transport, some workers will still see a car as the only realistic choice?

7.

Which section/person describes changing their mind after personal experience and realising that minimal cycle provision doesn’t count as genuine infrastructure?

8.

Which section/person expresses discomfort with portraying one group of road users as morally superior to another?

9.

Which section/person argues that charging for parking can rapidly influence behaviour, but warns that poorly designed charges may be seen as unfair to those with fewer housing choices?

10.

Which section/person highlights that working from home reduced some journeys but also created new patterns of travel, and implies the benefits were distributed unevenly across job types?

0 of 10 answered

← 返回所有Multiple matching测试查看所有C1 Advanced部分

别停下来

坚持练习的考生在考试中往往取得更高的分数。保持你的学习势头。

数千名考生的信赖之选

$8/month

每天不到 $0.27

  • 所有练习测试,无限使用
  • 写作任务 AI 反馈
  • 随时取消,没有约束
获取无限练习

已有账号? Log in

免费注册,开始练习。 Sign up

Also practice for:

雅思托福托业PTE学术